Friday 28 April 2023 - Report
Thursday 25 May 2023 - Project Specification
Topics: Project Delivery
Major programmes of investment and transformation can be high profile, complicated, fast-paced and undertaken in an environment with some degree of uncertainty.
For publicly funded bodies, stakeholders including tax payers are increasingly focussed on the extent to which major and strategic projects, including capital projects, demonstrate:
Jersey’s Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2019 defines a major project as:
The proposed total cost of for a major project must be approved as part of the Government Plan process. Annual cash allocations to reflect the agreed spending profile for the major project then need to be agreed as part of the relevant Government Plan.
A strategic project is defined by the Jersey Public Finances Law 2019 as a project which satisfies two or more of the following criteria:
In 2022, the Government spent nearly £100 million on capital and major projects.
The Government Plan 2023 to 2026 includes investment of almost £400 million in capital and major projects, excluding investment in new healthcare facilities.
I have undertaken and am planning a number of reviews that relate to major and strategic projects, including capital projects. These include the following reviews:
· Integrated Technology Solution – Follow Up (April 2023)
· Learning from Previous Hospital Projects: A Follow Up Review (May 2023)
· Strategic Property Management (planned for 2023).
This review will consider the overall arrangements for managing major and strategic projects as a portfolio. It will then consider in more detail a sample of specific projects not covered by my other reviews. I will consider a sample of completed and ongoing projects against the Good Practice Framework developed by the UK National Audit Office.
For the sample of projects selected for review, I will consider the following aspects:
o Is it clear what objective the project is intended to achieve?
o Have the right people bought into the project, such as users, suppliers, those who have to implement it?
o Do the procurement method and implementation option chosen meet the project’s objective and provide long-term value?
o Does the business case demonstrate value for money over the lifetime of the project?
o Are cost and duration estimates appropriate to the stage of development of the project, with risks and uncertainties appropriately reflected?
o Does the project have a plan to deliver benefits and is this being implemented?
· Set up:
o Are there structures (internal and external) that provide strong and effective oversight, challenge and direction in accordance with the requirements of the Public Finances Manual?
o Does the project have the right culture and leadership with the necessary authority and influence?
o Does the Government have the resources (staffing, capability, equipment, and so on) required to support the programme?
o Are scope and business requirements realistic, understood, clearly articulated and capable of being put into practice?
o Are key risks identified, understood and addressed?
· Delivery and Variation Management:
o Are there appropriate incentives for all parties to deliver (contractual, performance management, or other)?
o Is there an effective mechanism to control project variations?
o Is the project sufficiently flexible to deal with external changes in the operating context?
o Is progress being measured and assessed effectively?
o Are contracts being managed effectively?
o Is the project learning from experience of previous relevant projects?
o Is transition to business as usual when the project is completed being planned for effectively?
Under the requirements of the Public Finances Manual, every Major and Strategic Project is subject to an internal audit during the life of the project and other projects may be assessed as required. My review will consider any relevant work undertaken by the Government of Jersey Internal Audit function and will not duplicate it.
My review will consider overall arrangements for the programme of major and strategic projects, including capital projects. This will include assessment of the relative roles between client departments and supplier/contractor departments to ensure clarity in these roles. It will also include assessment of how the Government considers and monitors the deliverability of the overall programme.
My review will also consider a sample of projects in more detail. The sample of projects to be reviewed will include:
· New Government Headquarters
· Sewage Treatment Works
· Fire and Ambulance Headquarters; and
· Clinique Pinel.
For the sample of projects selected my review will include consideration of how the projects have adopted the Corporate Portfolio Management Office CPMO) Frameworks for Major, Strategic and Other Projects.
Later in 2023 I am planning a separate review of Strategic Property Management. That review will include consideration of how Government assesses need and prioritises capital investment in major property projects.
The objectives and/or scope of the review may be amended in the course of the review in the light of emerging findings or other matters arising.